線性結構模式

線性結構方程模式(SEM)對行為科學而言是一甚為有力的分析工具,本課程採應用導向,以循序漸進的方式介紹數種模式的型態,並透過實例具體說明SAS軟體 (PROC CALIS) 的配合操作方法,目的是使同學充分了解線性結構模式的概念及其應用時機,並熟悉操作技術,以增進研究能力。本課程也將特別著墨於利用線性結構模式診斷與控制測量上的共同方法變異(Common Method Variance, CMV)。最後兩週為彈性補充教學,將討論線性結構模式之模擬議題。

統計方法與資料分析,多變量分析

4. 教學方法及教學相關配合事項(如網站、助教、圖書講義及資料庫等): 全程由教師講授,以板書為主,power point為輔,並提供SAS程式給同學參考使用。

1. 學期作業: 須繳交一次學期作業。 2. 考試狀況: 期中考,期末考。 3. 評量方法: 作業 20%,期中考 30%,期末考50%。

• Introduction to SEM
• Multitrait–Multimethod
• Simulation
• Common Method Variance

Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Andover, Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning. 參考文獻: Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. Bagozzi, R. P. (1993). Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 49-87. Bagozzi, R. P. (2011). Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: Methodological and philosophical foundations. MIS Quarterly, 35, 261-292. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 547-560. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1991). Multitrait-multimethod matrices in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 426-439. Castro-Schilo, L., Grimm, K. J. & Widaman, K. F. (2016). Augmenting the correlated trait–correlated method model for multitrait–multimethod data. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 798-818. Chuang, S. J., & Ding, C. G. (2013). Measuring celebrity singer image. International Journal of Market Research, 55, 149-172. Chung, Y. Y., & Ding, C. G. (2002). Development of the sales locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 233-245. Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73. Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 381-398. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325-334. Conway, J. M., Lievens, F., Scullen, S. E., & Lance, C. E. (2004). Bias in the correlated uniqueness model for MTMM data. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 535-559. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 96-104. Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1987). Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 315-318. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269-277. Ding, C. G., & Jane, T. D. (2012). On the reliability, consistency, and method-specificity based on the CT-C(M-1) model. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 546-557. Ding, C. G., & Chang, Y. W. (2019). Effects of Task and work responsibilities idiosyncratic deals on perceived insider status and the moderating roles of perceived overall justice and coworker support. Review of Managerial Science, published online. Ding, C. G., & Shen, C. K. (2017). Perceived organizational support, participation in decision- making, and perceived insider status for contract workers: A case study. Management Decision, 55, 413-426. Ding, C. G., & Tseng, T. H. (2015). On the relationships among brand experience, hedonic emotions, and brand Equity. European Journal of Marketing, 49, 994-1015. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507. Fan, X., & Fan, X. (2005). Using SAS for Monte Carlo simulation research in SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 299-333. Fan, X., Felsovalyi, A., Sivo, S. A., & Keenan, S. C. (2002). SAS for Monte Carlo studies: A guide for quantitative researchers. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Fan Y., & Lance, C. E. (2017). A reformulated correlated trait–correlated method model for multitrait–multimethod data effectively increases convergence and admissibility rates. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 1048-1063. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. Girbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186-192. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson International Edition. Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. O’Rourke, N., & Hatcher, L. (2013). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104-121. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. Iacobucci, D. (2009). Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equation modeling) but afraid to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 673-680. Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equation modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90-98. Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait–multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford. Komaroff, E. (1997). Effect of simultaneous violations of essential tau-equivalence and uncorrelated error on coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 337-348. Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202-220. Lance, C. E., & Fan, Y. (2016). Convergence, admissibility, and fit of alternative confirmatory factor analysis models for MTMM data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 487-507. Lance, C. E., Noble, C. L., & Scullen, S. E. (2002). A critique of the correlated trait– correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait–multimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228-244. Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Song L. J. (2004). The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 483-496. Lee, N., & Hooley, G. (2005). The evolution of “classical mythology” within marketing measure development. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 365-385. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114-121. MacCallum, R. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107-120. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Burke, J. C. (2005). The Problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710-730. MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88, 542-555. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52, 1865-1883. Marsh, H. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335-361. Marsh, H. W., & Bailey, M. (1991). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47-70. McDonald, R. P. (1980). A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures: Some remarks on applications. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 161-183. Mishra, D. P. (2000). An empirical assessment of measurement error in health-care survey research. Journal of Business Research, 48, 193-205. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill. Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5, 343-355. Paxton, P., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Chen, F. (2001). Monte Carlo experiments: Design and implementation. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 287-312. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. Raykov, T., & Penev, S. (2005). Estimation of reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments in test-retest designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58, 285-299. Reuterberg, S. E., & Gustafsson, J. E. (1992). Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability: Testing measurement model assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 795-811. Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 762-800. Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 209-219. Silvia, E. S. M., & MacCallum, R. C. (1988). Some factors affecting the success of specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 297-326. Simmering, M. J., Fuller, C. M., Richardson, H. A., Ocal, Y., & Atinc, G. M. (2015). Marker variable choice, reporting, and interpretation in the detection of common method variance: A review and demonstration. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 473-511. Spector, P. E. (2006) Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232. Spector, P. E., Rosen, C. C., Richardson, H. A., Williams, L. J., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). A new perspective on method variance: A measure-centric approach. Journal of Management, 45, 855-880. Spector, P. E., Zapf, D., Chen, P. Y., & Frese, M. (2000). Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 79-95. Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55, 167-194. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 310-320. Widaman, K. E. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait- multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26. Williams, L. J. (2014). Use of an unmeasured latent method construct (ULMC) in the presence of multidimensional method variance. Presented at the 2014 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 1-5, 2014 Williams, L. J., & Brown, B. K. (1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-209. Williams, L. J., Gavin, M. B., & Williams, M. L. (1996). Measurement and nonmeasurement processes with negative affectivity and employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 88-101. Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker Technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 477-514. Williams, L. J., & McGonagle, A. K. (2016). Four research designs and a comprehensive analysis strategy for investigating common method variance with self-report measures using latent variables. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31, 339–359. Williams, L. J., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2015). Ideal, nonideal, and no-marker variables: The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) marker technique works when it matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1579-1602. Yang, C., Ding, C. G., & Lo, K. W. (2016). Ethical leadership and multidimensional organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating effects of self-efficacy, respect, and leader-member exchange. Group & Organization Management, 41, 343–374. 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(民95). 管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救. 管理學報,23 卷,1 期,77-98.

地點

教授研究室

時間

週一 14:00 ~ 16:00

聯絡方式

cding@mail.nctu.edu.tw