校際選修

115-1 選課時程

進行中

  • 初選第一階段 6/15/2026
  • 初選第二階段 6/22/2026
  • 校際選修 8/24/2026
  • 初選第三階段 8/31/2026
  • 開學後加退選 9/7/2026
  • 逾期加退選 9/21/2026
選課資源

科學學習心理學研究

Research in Psychology of Science Learning

學期
109-2
學分
2 學分
當期課號
5777
永久課號
IED5007
開課單位
教育研究所
授課教師
佘曉清
校區
光復
類別
必修
上課時間表
週一
3
10:10–11:00
科學學習心理學研究
HA218
2 節連堂
4
11:10–12:00

* 根據陽明交大上課時間表所列

概述

(一) 瞭解科學學習心理學的基本理論與實務教學應用。 (二) 瞭解影響概念改變研究的理論。 (三) 瞭解認知科學與概念改變與發展相關研究。 (四) 瞭解類比、後設認知、問題解決與科學學習。 (五) 瞭解概念改變教學策略與科學學習環境並進而促進學生科學學習與概念改變。 (六) 能撰寫促進科學概念發展與改變之教學研究報告。

評分方式

期中考 25% 期末口頭報告 1. 8個主題任選一篇 25% 2. 投影片 5% 3. 主題重點整理和評析寫成兩頁短paper 20% 平時成績: 25%

週次計畫
週次主題
第 1 週課程介紹
第 2 週和平紀念日補假
第 3 週注意、知覺 5 chapter 4
第 4 週運作記憶與長期記憶 5 chapter 5
第 5 週知識與心智表徵 4 chapter 2
第 6 週心智模型與科學學習 1 chapter 1
第 7 週兒童節調整放假
第 8 週類比學習的機制-6 chapter7; Harrison & Treagust (1993)
第 9 週科學推理(1)-3 chapter 7
第 10 週科學推理(2)-2 chapter 14; She & Liao (2010)
第 11 週科學論證(1)-Driver, Newton & Osborne. (2000)
第 12 週科學論證(2)-Osborne, Erduran & Simon (2004); Yeh & She (2010)
第 13 週期中考
第 14 週後設認知-Borkowski, J. G. (1996)
第 15 週口頭報告 1. Sternberg, R. J. (2003), CH11-楊采陵 2. Sinatra & Pintrich (2003), CH8-葉又僡 3. Sternberg, R. J. (2003), CH12-闕嘉瑩 4. Gilbert & Boulter (2000), CH6-許廷維 5. Gilbert & Boulter (2000), CH11-游南欣
第 16 週口頭報告 6. Thagard, P. (1992)- 林鴻成 7. Sinatra & Pintrich (2003), CH2-蘇暄涵 8. Erduran. & Jiménez-Aleixandre (2007), CH 1-劉家成 9. Chi, Slotta, & Leeuw (1994)- 洪瑋懋.
第 17 週端午節
第 18 週期末考
教科書

參考書目: Papers 1. Borkowski, J. G. (1996). Metacognition: Theory or chapter heading? Learning and Individual Differences.8(4), 391-402. 2. Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312. 3. Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D. F. (1993). Teaching with analogies: a case study in grade-10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1291-1307. 4. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms. Journal of Research in science Teaching, 41(10), 944-1020. 5. She, H.C., Cheng, M. T., Li, T. W., Wang, C.Y., Chiu, H.T., Lee, P.Z., Chou, W.C., Chuang, M.H., (2012). Web-based Undergraduate Chemistry Problem-Solving: the interplay of task performance, domain knowledge and web-searching strategies. Computers & Education, 59, 750-761. 6. She, H.C. & Liao, Y.W. (2010). Bridging Scientific Reasoning and Conceptual Change through Adaptive Web-based Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 91-119. 7. Yeh, K.H. & *She, H.C. (2010). On-line Synchronous Scientific Argumentation Learning: Nurturing Students’ Argumentation Ability and Conceptual Change in Science Context. Computers & Education, 55(2), 586-602. Books 1. Gentner, D. & Stevens, A. L. (1983): Mental Models (Lawrence Erlbaum:Hillsdale, NJ). -Chapter 1: Some observations on mental models 2. Hoffman, R. R. & Palermo, D. S.(1991). Cognition and the Symbolic Processes: Applied and Ecological Perspectives. Lawerence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. -Chapter 14: Children’s theories vs. scientific theories: difference in reasoning or difference in knowledge? 3. Lawson, A. E. (2003). The Neurological Basis of Learning, Development and Discovery. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. -Chapter 7: Intellectual development during the college years: is there a fifth stage? 4. Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. -Chapter 2: The concept “representation” 5. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Cognitive psychology (6th edition). Thomson Wadsworth publisher. -Chapter 4: Attention and consciousness; -Chapter 5: Memory: models and research methods; -Chap 11: Problem Solving and Creativity 6. Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press. -Chapter 7: The mechanisms of analogical learning 口頭報告主題(任選一個): 1. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D. & Leeuw, N. D. (1994). From Things to Processes: A Theory of Conceptual Change for Learning Science Concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43. 2. Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education -Chapter 1:Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview.(pp.3-27) 3. Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education -Chapter 3: Methodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classrooms. (pp.47-69) 4. Gilbert, J. K. & Boulter, C. (2000). Developing Models in Science Education -Chapter 6: Investigating the Role of Representations and Expressed Models in Building Mental Models.(pp.119-135) 5. Gilbert, John K. & Boulter, C. (2000). Developing Models in Science Education -Chapter 11: Teaching with Historical Models. (pp.209-226) 6. Schnotz, W., Vosniadou, S. & Carretero, M. (1999). New Perspectives on Conceptual Change. Amsterdam: Pergamon Press. -Chapter 3: Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints in conceptual change 7. Thagard, P. (1992) Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton, NJ, US: Princeton University Press. -Chap 3: Conceptual change 8. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Cognitive psychology. Thomson Wadsworth publisher. -Chap 12: Decision Making and Reasoning 9. Sinatra, G. M. & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Intentional Conceptual Change. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. -Chapter 13: Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning