網路法

• Course Goals This course aims to enhance the studentsunderstading of regulatory and policy aspects of the current state of internet regulations indicating numerous discrepancies and conflicts of national rules. Furthermore, the course outlines the problematic practice and insufficient international network regulations that leave no other option for internet governance and application of normative order of laws enforced abroad. The critical technique developed in the process of the course creates an understanding of when the internet serves humanity best where it carters to cross-border interaction governed by law: law with an appropriate reach determined not merely by national territoriality but also by broader international interests that transcend the public/private international law. Finally, the course not only presents a nuanced approach to the internet governance central challenge by analyzing the tech impact and its influence on human behavior on the internet but also it offers systematized requirements for network content policy and technology utilization devoting students to responsible use in response, furnishing human rights abusers with new avenues. The student 1) Understands the diversity of internet regulation bringing attention to the challenges of the territoriality-focused paradigm. 2) Is able to expose, minimize and eliminate the lack of governing law for managing the internet on a case-by-case basis. 3) Can increase certainty involved in network tech exchange and solve a problem of the international governance matter in an Internet context, introducing Internet activists and their experiences of interference with Internet access and use, raising questions and answers about Internet-related policy. 4) Is able to addresses an internet infrastructure for the Internet access for how end users directly access the internet through a network operator.

Language: The language of instruction is Bilingual; English (main) and Chinese and the reading materials are in English. Students are expected to attend lectures and participate on highlighted discussions, completes and present group and individual work with seminars, reads academic literature and primary legal sources, analyzes relevant cases. The examination will be in Bilingual. Students must have good English-language ability in reading, hearing, speaking, and writing. •Student Background: Student with a diversity of background and training are welcomed. •Preliminary knowledge (Prerequisites and co-requisites): It will be advantageous to have some prior familiarity with the Theories of Law, Network Operation Systems and Assigned Names, Computer Science, Sociology Philosophy, Logic.

Student Requirements 1. The student attends lectures, completes practical work and present group and individual work.

The total evaluation of the course is 100%. The assessment of professional skills consists of 1. group work in classroom seminars: 30% (a spoken) Students will be divided into groups for an experimental scenario of a problem. Each group has to defend the interests of the parties’ involved and present arguments. By doing group activity, students will develop team working skills and learn how to find a solution in a simulative way 2. individual work in practical sessions: 20% (in written) Students will be provided a draft of legal documents and required to complete it. Students will work with a particular regulation and have to complete legal documents based on the corresponding articles of that regulation. In that way, students will develop an independent way of thinking and learn to work with contracts, agreements and compliance policies. 3. final group or individual work completion and slides presentation: 50% (spoken & written) A student is free to submit PPT on one of the chosen topics from the six outlined in the course. A student is free to do it individually or with a classmate(s) and free with creativity, language (Eng. Or Chinese) and the way of PPT slides individually or with a classmates (s) free with creativity, language (Eng. Or Chinese) and the way of PPT slides. Deadline: 15 of January 23.59 p.m. The oral defense of the PPT draft 27 December 2022

• Class Materials 1) Kettemann, M. C. (2021;2020;). The normative order of the internet: A theory of rule and regulation online (First ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865995.001.0001 2) Hornle, J. (2021). Internet jurisdiction: Law and practice (First ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198806929.001.0001 3) Liddicoat, J., & Liddicoat. (2021). Human rights and the internet. Intersentia. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1017/9781839701672 4) Savin, A. I., & Edward Elgar Publishing. (2020). EU internet law. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789908572 5) Pollicino, O. (2021). Judicial protection of fundamental rights on the internet: A road towards digital constitutionalism?. Hart Publishing, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: 10.5040/9781509912728 6) Svantesson, D. J. B. (2017). Solving the internet jurisdiction puzzle. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795674.001.0001 7) Dinerstein, M., Einav, L., Levin, J., & Sundaresan, N. (2018). Consumer price search and platform design in internet commerce. The American Economic Review, 108(7), 1820-1859. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171218 8) Loader, B. D., & Dutton, W. H. (2012). A DECADE IN INTERNET TIME: The dynamics of the internet and society. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 609-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.677053 Recommended 9) DeNardis, L. (2014). The global war for internet governance. Yale University Press. 10) Radu, R. (2019). Negotiating internet governance (First ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833079.001.0001 11) Ng, J. (2013;2012;). The domain name registration system: Liberalisation, consumer protection, and growth. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203111727 12) Benedek, W., & Kettemann, M. C. (2020). Freedom of expression and the internet: Updated and revised 2nd edition. Council of Europe. 13) Schulte, S. R. (2013). Cached: Decoding the internet in global popular culture. New York University Press. 14) Meserve, S. A., & Pemstein, D. (2020). Terrorism and internet censorship. Journal of Peace Research, 57(6), 752-763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320959369 15) Narechania, T. N., & Stallman, E. (2021). internet federalism. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 34(2), 547.16) Dickinson, G. M. (2021). Rebooting internet immunity. The George Washington Law Review, 89(2), 347. 17) Teitcher, J. E. F., Bockting, W. O., Bauermeister, J. A., Hoefer, C. J., Miner, M. H., & Klitzman, R. L. (2015). Detecting, preventing, and responding to "fraudsters" in internet research: Ethics and trade-offs. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(1), 116-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12200 18) Norris, G., Brookes, A., & Dowell, D. (2019). The psychology of internet fraud victimisation: A systematic review. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34(3), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09334-5 19) Lageson, S. E., & Maruna, S. (2018). Digital degradation: Stigma management in the internet age. Punishment & Society, 20(1), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474517737050

地點

-

時間

Working time 7-9 p.m. (Taipei) or 1-3 p.m. (CET)

聯絡方式

Instructor: Daria Bulgakova, dariabulgakova@yahoo.com, Teaching Assistant: Su Thri Aung (Chen Mei-Meng), suthiri.lw10@nycu.edu.tw