批判與創意思考
Critical and Creative Thinking
| 節 | 週一 |
|---|---|
9 17:30–18:20 | 批判與創意思考 2 節連堂 |
A 18:30–19:20 |
* 根據陽明交大上課時間表所列
Course time: M9A Course no: 161012 Instructor: 顧醫華 TA: 郭耘吟 Google Meet link: meet.google.com/wer-biwi-xvd Google Classroom code: 3o6w4zm Our first class meeting will be on Monday, February 13 on Google Meet: meet.google.com/wer-biwi-xvd Sometime before our first class meeting, please use the following code to join the Google Classroom for this course: 3o6w4zm ______________________________________ Course Description Have you ever met someone you thought was really smart? What qualities did they have that made them special? Perhaps they could express themselves clearly, or recognize bias in themselves and others. Perhaps they were hard to deceive, or they could always see the deeper issues, analyze evidence and arguments, and easily figure things out for themselves. All of these abilities are abilities to think critically and creatively. Studies show that critical and creative thinking is what employers expect from people with a university education, and for good reason: it is useful in every domain and discipline. Critical thinkers are also better citizens as they can understand and argue for evidence-based political positions. Critical thinking is more useful now than ever, given the increased availability of information online. All that information can be dangerous, if you don’t know how to process it, that is, if you don’t know what conclusions you can, should, and should not draw from it. Critical and creative thinkers also tend to be happier people, because they have less uncertainty about what to believe, and what to do. They can solve problems more efficiently, and avoid future problems, as well as communicate better with family, friends, employers, and teachers. Course Aims This course will be useful to you, not just because it will teach you how to think critically, but because it will help you to practice the skills involved in critical thinking, making them part of who you are. First, we introduce you to deductive, inductive, and analogical arguments. Then we discuss how to identify and avoid many of the most common cognitive biases that cloud human reasoning. In addition to learning how to analyze arguments and avoid cognitive biases, you will learn how to be more imaginative and creative. Finally, you will apply your new skills to some of today’s most complex issues, including science denialism, artificial intelligence, gender, and ethics.
Methods of Instruction Lecture videos: Each week, students will watch one or two 10-15 minute videos. Students must watch these videos before attending the weekly discussion session. Weekly exercises: Each week, after watching the lecture videos, students will complete one or two Google Forms that contain exercises regarding that week’s material. Students must submit these exercises (either on Google Forms or Google Classroom) before attending the weekly discussion session. Weekly discussion sessions: Each week, students will meet with their TA on Google Meet during the designated class time to discuss that week’s material. Course Policies This course will be conducted in English. Your TA and instructor are determined by the time that your discussion session meets---please see the beginning of this document. Regarding discussion sessions, students must attend at the same time and with the same TA each week. In other words, students are not permitted to choose to attend at, say, Tuesday 17:30 one week and then, say, Thursday 17:30 the following week. Students are required to join Google Classroom for this course. During the first week, your TA will give you the course code and explain how to join. Instructors and TAs will communicate course announcements mainly through Google Classroom. Instructors and TAs will be available to answer students’ questions via email and Google Classroom. They will also be available to meet with students by appointment (online meetings). Students who have questions about course material should either ask their TA or the instructor who is responsible for that material (see the ‘Lecturer’ column in the course schedule below). For example, if students have a question about inductive arguments, they should either ask their TA or 嚴偉哲 / Jonathon Hricko. Students who have questions about other aspects of the course besides the material (e.g., attendance, grading) should either ask their TA or their instructor.
Attendance and participation in weekly discussion sessions: 14% (graded pass-fail) In order to receive full credit, students must attend and participate in weekly discussion sessions. Absences will be excused only if students request leave through the university’s system. Completion of weekly exercises: 21% (graded pass-fail) In order to receive full credit, students must submit their exercises before the weekly discussion session each week. Students may work on their exercises individually or in groups, but each student must submit their own exercises in order to receive credit. Midterm project: 30% & Final project: 35% Midterm and final projects will be announced at least two weeks before the due dates. See the course schedule below for the due dates. Plagiarism will not be tolerated, and students who plagiarize risk getting a zero for the project.
| 週次 | 主題 |
|---|---|
| 第 1 週 | Introduction |
| 第 2 週 | Statements and arguments |
| 第 3 週 | 228連假 |
| 第 4 週 | Validity and soundness |
| 第 5 週 | Inductive arguments |
| 第 6 週 | Analogical arguments |
| 第 7 週 | Fallacies |
| 第 8 週 | 清明連假 |
| 第 9 週 | Argument mapping |
| 第 10 週 | Cognitive biases The midterm project will be due on Monday, 5/1, 17:00. |
| 第 11 週 | Plagiarism |
| 第 12 週 | Creativity and imagination |
| 第 13 週 | The creative process |
| 第 14 週 | Scientific reasoning and science denialism 1 |
| 第 15 週 | Scientific reasoning and science denialism 2 |
| 第 16 週 | Final project week The final project will be due on Friday, 6/9, 17:00. |
| 第 17 週 | Flexible learning week |
| 第 18 週 | Flexible learning week |
Critical Thinking Web, maintained by Joe Lau, Philosophy Department, University of Hong Kong. http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/ Foresman, G. A., Fosl, P. S., & Watson, J. C. (2016). The Critical Thinking Toolkit. Wiley-Blackwell.
- 聯絡方式
- mikestuart@nycu.edu.tw