工藝設計中的視覺、物質與政治
Visuality, Materiality and Politics in Design History
學期
112-1
學分
3
學分
當期課號
133300
永久課號
SHVC30031
開課單位
視覺文化研究所
授課教師
黃桂瑩
校區
陽明
類別
選修
上課時間表
| 節 | 週一 |
|---|---|
5 13:20–14:10 | 工藝設計中的視覺、物質與政治 YX322 3 節連堂 |
6 14:20–15:10 | |
7 15:30–16:20 |
* 根據陽明交大上課時間表所列
概述
在視覺文化研究領域中,工藝設計的歷史與其物質性(materiality)逐漸成為學者關注的焦點之一。許多過往被認為屬於裝飾藝術而常被排除於藝術史研究的媒材形式(例如:家具、壁紙、陶瓷、織品...),事實上承載了不同文化情境下的歷史意涵。本課程首先探究藝術史、視覺文化與物質研究等領域的互動交流,接著從十六世紀歐洲裝飾藝術的發展開始,逐步探討文化認同、東西交流、性別意識、殖民與工藝創作、工藝教育等議題,最後以1970年代的工業設計為結束點。藉由這些議題探討,帶領學生思考視覺研究的領域與方法,並且省思工藝設計中的各種政治性(politics)。
先修科目
本課程為視覺文化研究所專題課程,修課學生需為研究所以上方可選修。
教學方式
本課程閱讀資料以英文學術著作為主,輔以中文著作。每週均有指定閱讀範圍,同學需於課前閱讀完畢,於課堂積極參與討論,以訓練表達與詮釋技巧。此外,同學將藉由撰寫期中與期末報告,實際演練課堂習得之相關方法理論,並培養獨立學術研究的能力。
評分方式
課堂口頭報告:15% 課堂參與討論:15% 期中書面報告(3000字以上,含註釋及參考書目):20% 期中與期末口頭報告:10% 期末書面報告(7000字以上,含註釋及參考書目):40% *本課程書面報告為一萬字文章(期中、期末合計)一篇,主題任選,但需與本課程主題相關。期中口頭報告為大綱說明,期末口頭報告則需呈現更為完整之分析內容。
週次計畫
| 週次 | 主題 |
|---|---|
| 第 1 週 | 課程導論 Malcolm Barnard, Art, Design and Visual Culture An Introduction, “Signs, Codes and Visual Culture,” (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998), pp. 124-142. |
| 第 2 週 | 藝術史、視覺文化與物質性 1. Guy Julier, “From Visual Culture to Design Culture,” Design Issues, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Winter, 2006), pp. 64-76. 2. Wayne A. Williams, Janice Rieger, “A Design History of Design: Complexity, Criticality, and Cultural Competence,” RACAR: revue d'art canadienne / Canadian Art Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, (2015), pp. 15-21. |
| 第 3 週 | 工藝設計、王權與國家:以法國為例 1. James Parker, Alice M. Zrebiec, Jessie McNab, Clare Le Corbeiller and Clare Vincent, “French Decorative Arts during the Reign of Louis XIV 1654-1715,” The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, Vol. 46, No. 4, (Spring, 1989), pp. i+10-64. (本文章多為彩圖,實際文字約16頁左右。) 2. Nicola Courtright, “From Gregory XIII to Louis XIV:The Art and Politics of Reform in France,” : Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome , Vol. 54 (2009), pp. 3-30. 參考資料:Edith A. Standen, “The Tapestry Weaver and the King: Philippe Behagle and Louis XIV,” Metropolitan Museum Journal, 1998, Vol. 33 (1998), pp. 183-204. |
| 第 4 週 | 高雅藝術與設計工藝:論辯與分流 (I) 1. David Irwin, “Art versus Design: The Debate 1760-1860,” Journal of Design History , Vol. 4, No. 4 (1991), pp. 219-232. 2. 謝佳娟,〈藝術的進程:十八世紀下半葉英國藝術、製造業、商業勵進會對文雅藝術的提倡〉,《藝術學研究》,26期,2020年6月,57-142頁。 |
| 第 5 週 | 高雅藝術與設計工藝:論辯與分流 (II) 1. Christine Velut, “Between Invention and Production: The Role of Design in the Manufacture of Wallpaper in France and England at the Turn of the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Design History, Vol. 17, No. 1, (2004), pp. 55-69. 2. Malcolm Barnard, Art, Design and Visual Culture, An Introduction, “Producers: Artists and Designers,” (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998), pp. 58-78. |
| 第 6 週 | 傳統與創新:十八世紀歐洲工藝 1. Mary Guyatt, “The Wedgwood Slave Medallion: Values in Eighteenth-Century Design,” Journal of Design History, Vol. 13, No. 2 (2000), pp. 93-105. (約9頁) 2. Nancy H. Ramage,“Flying Maenads and Cupids: Pompeii, Herculaneum, and Eighteenth-Century Decorative Arts,” Studies in the History of Art, Vol. 79, (2013), pp. 161-176. 3. Mimi Hellman, “Furniture, Sociability, and the Work of Leisure in Eighteenth-Century France,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4, (Summer, 1999), pp. 415-445. |
| 第 7 週 | 東西交流中的工藝設計 1. Julie Bellemare, “Design Books in the Chinese Taste: Marketing the Orient in England and France, 1688- 1735,” Journal of Design History, 2014, Vol. 27, No. 1 (2014), pp. 1-16. 2. Kristina Kleutghen, “Chinese Occidenterie: the Diversity of "Western" Objects in Eighteenth-Century China,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, Vol. 47, No. 2, (Winter, 2014), pp. 117-135. |
| 第 8 週 | 他者的工藝 1. Aurélie Petiot, “Crafting Colonial Masculinity: Charles Robert Ashbee’s Educational Programme in Egypt and Jerusalem, 1917-1921,” Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies, Issue 14.2 (Fall 2018), https://www.ncgsjournal.com/issue142/PDFs/petiot.pdf (約19頁) 2. Soumhya Venkatesan, “Rethinking Agency: Persons and Things in the Heterotopia of 'Traditional Indian Craft’,” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Mar., 2009), pp. 78-95. |
| 第 9 週 | 期中口頭報告 |
| 第 10 週 | 工藝中的性別氣質 (I) 1. Maureen Daly Goggin and Beth Fowkes Tobin (eds.), Women and the Material Culture of Needlework and Textiles, 1750–1950, (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009) 章節待定。 2. Rozsika Parker, The Subversive Stitch : Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine, “The Domestication of Embroidery” (London: I.B. Taurisr, 2010), 頁數待確認。 |
| 第 11 週 | 工藝中的性別氣質 (II) 1. Maya Wassell Smith, “The Fancy Work What Sailors Make’: Material and Emotional Creative Practice in Masculine Seafaring Communities,” Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies, Issue 14.2 (Fall 2018), https://www.ncgsjournal.com/issue142/smith.html (約17頁). 2. Rebecca Houze, “From Wiener Kunst im Hause to the Wiener Werkstätte: Marketing Domesticity with Fashionable Interior Design,” Design Issues, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Winter, 2002), pp. 3-23. |
| 第 12 週 | 打造理想國:工藝設計與政治 (I) 1. Sandra Alfoldy, “The Commodification of William Morris: Emotive Links in a Mass-Produced World,” RACAR: revue d'art canadienne / Canadian Art Review, Vol. 27, No. 1/2 (2000), pp. 102-110. 2. Jeffrey Petts, “Good Work and Aesthetic Education: William Morris, the Arts and Crafts Movement, and Beyond,” The Journal of Aesthetic Education, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Spring, 2008), pp. 30-45. |
| 第 13 週 | 打造理想國:工藝設計與政治 (II) 1. Anthea Callen, Angel in the Studio: Women in the Arts and Crafts Movement 1870-1914, (Astragal Books, 1979). 章節待定。 2. Suzette Worden and Jill Seddon, “Women Designers in Britain in the 1920s and 1930s: Defining the Professional and Redefining Design,” Journal of Design History, Vol. 8, No. 3 (1995), pp. 177-193. 3. Lauren S. Weingarden, “Aesthetics Politicized: William Morris to the Bauhaus,” Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Spring, 1985), pp. 8-13. |
| 第 14 週 | 設計教育 1. Barbara Jaffee, “Before the New Bauhaus: From Industrial Drawing to Art and Design Education in Chicago,” Design Issues, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Winter, 2005), pp. 41-62. 2. John V. Maciuika, Weimar Thought, “The Politics of Art and Architecture at the Bauhaus, 1919–1933,” (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2013), pp. 291-315. |
| 第 15 週 | 案例研究:日本、美國、斯堪地那維亞 1. Shuichi Nakayama, “The Impact of William Morris in Japan, 1904 to the Present,” Journal of Design History, Vol. 9, No. 4 (1996), pp. 273-283. 2. Edward S. Cooke Jr., “Modern Craft and the American Experience,” American Art, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Spring 2007), pp. 2-9. 3. Margaret Hodges, “Nationalism and Modernism: Rethinking Scandinavian Design in Canada, 1950-1970,” RACAR: revue d'art canadienne / Canadian Art Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, (2015), pp. 57-71. |
| 第 16 週 | 期末口頭報告 |
Office Hours
- 地點
- 北投校區:知行樓405室
- 時間
- 另行約定
- 聯絡方式
- kyhuang@nycu.edu.tw