家屋與空間正義:台灣—美國全球化教室

大家是否曾經騎著單車沿著17公里海岸線從南寮到新竹香山海邊看夕陽,濕地,大風車,吃海鮮逛魚市,或是到旁邊一棟具有濃濃文青風的清水模建築拍照打卡? 是否曾經注意到在這些網紅景點的旁邊有一排低矮的房舍,伴隨著用漂流木,漁網,浮球點綴的裝置藝術?? 可曾聽過新竹有個阿美族部落名叫那魯灣,就隱身於此,與上述大型現代設施與觀光景點格格不入的共存了接近半世紀? 本課程將藉由那魯灣這個特殊案例,帶領大家一起探索"家"這個概念在歷史文化,社會變遷與族群政治下的意涵:是什麼原因讓原本世居台東的阿美族遷徙了大半台灣來到新竹香山定居? 他們為什麼選擇把房子蓋在被河堤,西濱公路,大型風場環繞的土地上? 是什麼原因讓他們選擇不在市區租屋,將這些蓋在國有地上的鐵皮屋視為家?當周邊土地不斷被新竹市府收編規劃為觀光區,當部落下一代離開部落進入城市求學工作與生活,當城市房屋與土地價格越來越高,部落未來的家在何處? 由誰決定? 那魯灣居民所面臨的挑戰,不應只被理解成都市原住民議題,這些關於家屋,土地,居住權的議題實則反映了台灣社會在快速工業化與社會轉型中長期被忽視的城鄉不均衡發展與居住權,也是一個與我們每個人的現狀與未來息息相關的課題。或許追求經濟成長的代價是將多數人轉化成了城市中的遊牧民族,在高度發展的城市中賃屋而居尋找生存一席之地。然而,高房價高房貸的未來是不是必然? 居住權是需要被保障的基本人權還是人們的自主選擇與競爭力的展現? 如何在棲居與流動兩種狀態中找尋平衡? 對移動與安定的雙重渴望如何影響我們與社區,與土地,與城市的關係? 以那魯灣案例為鏡,本課程請同學思考當代流動社會下對家的想像,建造,居住與空間正義。 Have you ever cycled along the 17-kilometer Coastline that connects Hsinchu Nan-liao and Xiangshan Beach to enjoy the scenery of the sunset, wetlands, and windmills, as well as the famous seafood and fish market? Did you ever notice that next to these tourists' spots is a row of low-ceiling houses, accompanied by installation art decorated with driftwood, fishing nets, and floating balls? Do you know there is an Amis tribe in Hsinchu named Naluwan, whose residents have lived in these houses on a narrow street next to the above large-scale modern facilities and tourist attractions for nearly half a century? Leveraging on the case study of Naluwan, this course explores housing issues and dwelling politics in contemporary Taiwan: what motivated the Naluwan Amis to move from Taitung to Hsinchu? Why did they choose not to rent houses in urban areas but to build their houses on state-owned lands surrounded by riverbanks, highways, and large wind turbines? How does Naluwan maintain the sense of community and the Amis identity when the younger generations are leaving the tribe for study or work? While the government continues to expropriate the coastal lands for tourism, along with the increasing housing prices in the city, where is the future home for the Naluwan people? Who has the right to decide? The challenges faced by the Naluwan people should not only be understood as indigenous issues; rather, they reflect the imbalanced development between urban and rural areas in Taiwanese society, due to rapid industrialization and social transformation. Is high housing prices and high mortgage rates an inevitable outcome of economic growth? Is the right to adequate housing a basic human right that needs to be protected? How do we find "home" in an age of globalization where high mobility is a prerequisite for effective work? Using Naluwan as a mirror, this course also invites students to contemplate the meaning of home and spatial justice in contemporary mobile society.

本課程為雙語授課,適合以下同學選修 1. 對技術社會人文藝術跨領域議題有高度興趣者 2. 對於部落文化與社區參與有興趣者 3. 對多媒體創作與敘事有興趣者 This is a bilinfual course, suitable for undergraduate and graduate students who are interested in: 1. Interdisciplinary issues at the interface of technology, society, humanities and art 2. Indigenous culture and community participation 3. Multimedia storytelling, creation and narrative

本課程分為三部分: 1. 理論視角: 本課程將帶領同學閱讀經典的城市,家屋與族群研究案例與理論,作為系統性思考台灣在地議題的分析工具。 2. 田野踏查: 本課程使用 "部落教室" 作為教學方法,帶領同學進入部落實體調研,透過與部落居民一起走讀觀影與討論家屋相關議題,讓同學更深入理解那魯灣家屋遷徙與重建案例中牽涉到的社會文化與政治議題。 3. 部落訪談與多媒體創作: 修課同學將與部落家庭配對,訪談各戶家庭遷徙的家族史以及對家屋重建的考量與期待。這部分的資料收集將構成期末創作的原始素材。修課同學將實際田野考察與部落訪談資料轉化成數位媒體影音製作為期末產出。學生可選擇以攝影、民族誌電影、空間設計、遊戲設計、虛擬策展、文化記憶庫建置等其他形式做為可能之期末作業。 本課程透過教育部「人文社會與產業實務創新鏈結」與Meta進行AR/VR 之技術合作,將會開設一學分由Meta業師授課之微學分課程,教授相關技術並與Meta Spark 多媒體工作者交流。同時,學期間將有三次聯合工作坊,分別於課程第二周,第八周與第十六周,協同本校建築所、資工系、科社所、傳播所等師生,共同參與新竹香山那魯灣部落之地方創生與空間規劃討論。

作業 50% :4組田野筆記 20% (field note);家族訪談: 30% 展演 30%: 期末作品構想書(計10%),以及期末展演作品(計20%) 其他 20%:出席率(上課發言、討論等)

紀錄片 三叉坑,陳亮丰導演 Liang-Feng CHEN (2006) Three Fork Village. Documentary ANDERSON, A. B. (Ed.). (2013). Home in the City: Urban Aboriginal Housing and Living Conditions. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442662230 Barker, A. J. (2015). Already occupied: Indigenous peoples, settler colonialism and the occupy movements in North America. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 327–334. Gutiérrez Sánchez, I. (2022). Dwelling as politics: An emancipatory praxis of/through care and space in everyday life. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 40(3), 549–566. Wilkins, A. (2019). Migration, Work and Home-Making in the City: Dwelling and Belonging among Vietnamese Communities in London (1st ed.). Routledge. Desmond, Matthew (2016) Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City. New York: Crown/Archetype. (中文版:下一個家在何方?驅離,臥底社會學家的居住直擊報告) Moskowitz, Peter (2018) How to Kill a City: Gentrification, Inequality, and the Fight for the Neighborhood. Bold Type Book. (中文版: 如何謀殺一座城市:高房價、居民洗牌與爭取居住權的戰鬥 Rybczynski, Witold (1986) Home: A Short History of an Idea by 金窩、銀窩、狗窩:一段追尋「舒適」的住宅建築發展史 Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding Home: A Critical Review of the Literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62–89. 無住之島:給臺灣青年世代居住正義的出路 Richard Sennett (2018) Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City. Yale University Press. 中譯本: 理查.桑內特 (2020) 棲居:都市規劃的過去、現在與未來,如何打造開放城市,尋找居住平衡的新契機? Behrendt, L. (2009). Home: The importance of place to the dispossessed. South Atlantic Quarterly, 108(1), 71-85.

地點

NYCU campus office or google meeting room

時間

by appointment

聯絡方式

sharonku@nycu.edu.tw