高等兒童物理治療評量
Advanced Physical Therapy Assessment in Children
| 節 | 週一 |
|---|---|
2 09:00–09:50 | 高等兒童物理治療評量 YB530 3 節連堂 |
3 10:10–11:00 | |
4 11:10–12:00 |
* 根據陽明交大上課時間表所列
學生在修習本課程後,應能: 1. 瞭解物理治療師在早期療育場域經常接觸之評量工具的發展、執行、分析與解釋的重要觀念及步驟 2. 瞭解兒童發展評量工具的基本心理計量知識 3. 瞭解早期療育常用之評量工具,並能客觀地評析其優點及限制 4. 能依照目的選擇適切的評量工具於臨床或研究使用
需先修習過兒童發展、兒童物理治療相關課程
課堂講授、報告、討論、實作
期末口頭報告25%、書面報告25%、課堂參與25%、參與聯評中心個案評估並撰寫個案評估報告(非聯評中心正式評估報告)25%
| 週次 | 主題 |
|---|---|
| 第 1 週 | Introduction: basic concepts, historical perspectives, and ethical and social considerations in children testing |
| 第 2 週 | Norms and the meaning of test scoresBasic and advanced statistics used in children testing |
| 第 3 週 | Reliability (1): history and theory, domain sampling model, models of reliabilityReading and discussion (1) |
| 第 4 週 | Reliability (2): reliability in behavioral observation studiesTests application in evidence based practice for children: using and interpreting information about reliabilityReading and discussion (2) |
| 第 5 週 | Validity (1): basic concepts, decision theory, measurement and interpretation國慶日連假調整為線上 |
| 第 6 週 | Validity (2): Tests application in evidence based practice for children: measurement validity Reading and discussion (3) |
| 第 7 週 | Developing Norm-Referenced Standardized Tests |
| 第 8 週 | Critical appraisal for the psychometrics of screening tests for children |
| 第 9 週 | Outcome measures, defining and explaining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pediatric physical therapyReading and discussion (4) |
| 第 10 週 | Item analysis and its application |
| 第 11 週 | Student report: Critical appraisal for the psychometrics of neuromotor and/or developmental tests for children |
| 第 12 週 | Assessments of social-emotional function for infants and children |
| 第 13 週 | Assessments of motivation and environmental factors for children |
| 第 14 週 | Curriculum based model: assessment, evaluation, and programming system for infants and children (AEPS) |
| 第 15 週 | Other issues: group testing, self-report, intelligence test, and personality test, Computer Adaptive Testing approach |
| 第 16 週 | Final report |
1. Susana Urbina. Essentials of Psychological Testing. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. 2014 (ISBN-10: 1118680480) 2. Anastasi A, Urbina S. Psychological Testing. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River NJ, Prentice- Hall Inc. 1997. (ISBN-10: 0023030852) 3. Wilhelm IJ. (ed). Physical Therapy Assessment in Early Infancy. New York, NY. Churchill Livingstone. 1993. (ISBN-10: 0443088152) 4. Murphy KR, Davidshofer CO. Psychological Testing, Principles and Applications. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. 2004 (ISBN-10: 0131891723) 5. http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/booths/diag.html 6. Selected book chapters and journal articles [1] Miller LJ (ed). Developing Norm-Referenced Standardized Tests. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1989;9:1-194. [2] Yao KG. The development of measurement instruments from psychometric point of view (in Chinese). J Occup Ther ROC 1996;14:v-xxi. [3] Yao KG, Chen KH. How to construct a questionnaire: using the "health-related quality of life" questionnaire as an example (in chinese). J Occup Ther ROC 1998;16:1-24. [4] Sim J & Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 2005;85:257-268. [5] Fritz, JM, & Wainner, RS. Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective. Physical Therapy, 2001; 81:1546-1564. [6] Beaton, D. E., Boers, M., & Wells, G. A. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): A literature review and directions for future research. Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 2002;14(2):109-114. [7] Crosby, R. D., Kolotkin, R. L., & Williams, G. R. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003;56(5):395-407. [8] Iyer LV, Haley SM, Watkins MP, Dumas HM. Establishing minimal clinically important differences for scores on the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory for inpatient rehabilitation. Physical Therapy. 2003;83:888-898. [9] Park SH, Goo JM, Jo CH. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5(1):11-8. Review. [10] Morgan GA, Maslin-Cole CA, et al. Play Assessment of Mastory Motivation in Infants & Young Children. In Shaefer CE, Gitlin K, Sandgrund A. (eds) Play Diagnosis and Assessment. New York: Wiley. 1991: 65-86. [11] Wilson, B. N., Kaplan, B. J., Crawford, S. G., Campbell, A., & Dewey, D. (2000). Reliability and validity of a parent questionnaire on childhood motor skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 484–493. [12] Jette AM, Haley SM. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2005 Nov; 37(6): 339-45.