STEM教學與研究

本課程介紹STEM中科學、數學、工程與科技的內涵,以及相關STEM的發展歷史,並且藉由STEM活動的體驗課程以及相關文獻介紹,引導學生做STEM活動的課程設計與相關研究設計,期能讓學生可以經由此課程學習到如何從事STEM教學活動與研究基礎。

1.出席(14%) 2.參與和討論(16%) 3.文獻口頭報告(25%) 4.STEM實作演練與發表(15%) 5.課程設計活動發表與課程教案(30%)

1. Altan, E. B., & Tan, S. (2020). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-27. 2. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and engineering teacher, 70(1), 30-35. 3. Bybee, R. W. (2014). NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of science teacher education, 25(2), 211-221. 4. Chalmers, C., Carter, M. L., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2017). Implementing “big ideas” to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25-43. 5. Chien, Y. H., & Chu, P. Y. (2018). The Different Learning Outcomes of High School and College Students on a 3D-Printing STEAM Engineering Design Curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1047-1064. 6. Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K-12 science teachers conceptualize STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1701-1720. 7. English, L. D., King, D. & Smeed, J. (2017). Advancing integrated STEM learning through engineering design: Sixth-grader students’ design and construction of earthquake resistant buildings. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 255-271. 8. Grangeat, M., Harrison, C., & Dolin, J. (2021). Exploring assessment in STEM inquiry learning classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 345-361. 9. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational researcher, 42(1), 38-43. 10. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 11. International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association. 12. Koestler, C., Felton-Koestler, M. D., Bieda, K., & Otten, S. (2013). Connecting the NCTM process standards and the CCSSM practices. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 13. Leung, A. (2018). Exploring STEM pedagogy in the mathematics classroom: A tool-based experiment lesson on estimation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-20. 14. National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. National Academies Press. 15. Pruitt, S. L. (2014). The next generation science standards: The features and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 145-156. 16. Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: integrated STEM education as promising practice?. International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387-1407. 17. Sun, L., Hu, L., Yang, W., Zhou, D., & Wang, X. (2021). STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 346-358.

地點

HA202B

時間

請跟老師另外約討論時間

聯絡方式

email: sengechen@nycu.edu.tw