創新與創業理論研討(一)
Innovation and entrepreneurship theory seminar (I)
Innovation and entrepreneurship is increasingly the source of sustainable competitive advantage for firms in the global knowledge economy. In the past several decades, scholars have provided sufficient understanding of the innovation and entrepreneurship management. This course aims to systematically introduce the theory of innovation and entrepreneurship to provide students a clear picture of what current literature has done and what we may go. Through studying a series of classical papers and readings, students are expected to develop an understanding of what are the theories and how can they be used in the research of the innovation and entrepreneurship fields. The teaching materials include journal papers published in the leading journals.
none
Assigned readings
Paper presentation 50% Proposal or paper writing 50%
| 週次 | 主題 |
|---|---|
| 第 1 週 | Introduction - What is theory? - What is innovation and entrepreneurship |
| 第 2 週 | Cooptition and Coopetitors - Yan, Dong & Faems_2020 Long Range Planning Not every coopetitor is the same: The impact of technological, market and geographical overlap with coopetitors on firms’ breakthrough inventions. - Raza-Ullah 2020 Long range planning Experiencing the paradox of coopetition:A moderated mediation framework explaining the paradoxical tension–performance relationship |
| 第 3 週 | Cooptition and Coopetitors (2) - Estrada, I., & Dong, J. Q. (2020). Learning from experience? Technological investments and the impact of coopetition experience on firm profitability. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101866. - Runge, S., Schwens, C., & Schulz, M. (2022). The invention performance implications of coopetition: How technological, geographical, and product market overlaps shape learning and competitive tension in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 43(2), 266-294. |
| 第 4 週 | Cooptition and Coopetitors (3) - Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., & Kraus, S. (2020). Configurations of firm-level value capture in coopetition. Long range planning, 53(1), 101869. - Seepana, C., Paulraj, A., & Huq, F. A. (2020). The architecture of coopetition: Strategic intent, ambidextrous managers, and knowledge sharing. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 100-113. |
| 第 5 週 | Cooptition and Coopetitors (4) - Gnyawali, D. R., & Ryan Charleton, T. (2018). Nuances in the interplay of competition and cooperation: Towards a theory of coopetition. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2511-2534. - Gernsheimer, O., Kanbach, D. K., & Gast, J. (2021). Coopetition research-A systematic literature review on recent accomplishments and trajectories. Industrial Marketing Management, 96, 113-134. |
| 第 6 週 | Multimarket Contact (1) - Domínguez, B., Gómez, J., & Maícas, J. P. (2021). Multimarket pioneers: Does multimarket contact improve their performance?. Long Range Planning, 54(2), 101993. - Klein, K., Semrau, T., Albers, S., & Zajac, E. J. (2020). Multimarket coopetition: How the interplay of competition and cooperation affects entry into shared markets. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101868. |
| 第 7 週 | Multimarket Contact (2) - Ryu, W., Reuer, J. J., & Brush, T. H. (2020). The effects of multimarket contact on partner selection for technology cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 41(2), 267-289. - Varadarajan, R. (2023). Resource advantage theory, resource based theory, and theory of multimarket competition: Does multimarket rivalry restrain firms from leveraging resource Advantages?. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113713. |
| 第 8 週 | Multimarket contact and safeguards - Hsu, S. T., & Cohen, S. K. (2022). Overcoming the incumbent dilemma: The dual roles of multimarket contact during disruption. Journal of Management Studies, 59(2), 319-348. - Lioukas, C. S., & Reuer, J. J. (2020). Choosing between safeguards: Scope and governance decisions in R&D alliances. Journal of Management, 46(3), 359-384. |
| 第 9 週 | Multimarket contact and safeguards (2) - Choi, J. (2020). Mitigating the challenges of partner knowledge diversity while enhancing research & development (R&D) alliance performance: the role of alliance governance mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(1), 26-47. - Choi, J., & Contractor, F. J. (2019). Improving the progress of research & development (R&D) projects by selecting an optimal alliance structure and partner type. British Journal of Management, 30(4), 791-809. |
| 第 10 週 | General discussion |
| 第 11 週 | Exploration and Exploitation (1) - Coluccia, Dabić, Del Giudice, Fontana & Solimene 2020 JBR R&D innovation indicator and its effects on the market. An empirical assessment from a financial perspective. - Matthews, Heyden & Zhou_2022 Research Policy Paradoxical transparency: Capital market responses to exploration and exploitation disclosure. |
| 第 12 週 | Exploration and Exploitation (2) - Hussinger, K., & Pacher, S. (2019). Information ambiguity, patents and the market value of innovative assets. Research policy, 48(3), 665-675. - Jia, N. (2017). Corporate innovation strategy, analyst forecasting activities and the economic consequences. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(5-6), 812-853. |
| 第 13 週 | Dynamic capabilities - Jurksiene & Pundziene_European Business Review_2016_The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. - Farzaneh,Wilden, Afshari, & Mehralian 2022 JBR Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. |
| 第 14 週 | Dynamic capabilities (2) - Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. (2020). Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations. Journal of Business Research, 112, 363-372. - Teece, D. J. (2018). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(3), 359-368. |
| 第 15 週 | Dynamic capabilities (3) - Weiss, L., & K. Kanbach, D. (2022). Toward an integrated framework of corporate venturing for organizational ambidexterity as a dynamic capability. Management Review Quarterly, 72(4), 1129-1170. - Wenke, K., Zapkau, F. B., & Schwens, C. (2021). Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance. Journal of Business Research, 132, 653-665. |
| 第 16 週 | Dynamic capabilities (4) - Petruzzelli, A. M. (2019). Trading knowledge for status: Conceptualizing R&D alliance formation to achieve ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 36-42 - van Lieshout, J. W., van der Velden, J. M., Blomme, R. J., & Peters, P. (2021). The interrelatedness of organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities and open innovation: a conceptual model towards a competitive advantage. European Journal of Management Studies, 26(2/3), 39-62. |
no